Probing interfacial pair breaking in tunnel junctions based on the first and the second harmonics of the Josephson current
Yu. S. Barash
arXiv:1204.2105 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.174529 · 2012-04-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
It will be shown that a pronounced interfacial pair breaking can be identified in Josephson tunnel junctions provided the first j_{1c} and the second j_{2c} harmonics of the supercurrent, as well as the depairing current in the bulk j_{dp}, are known. Namely, within the Ginzburg-Landau theory a strong interfacial pair breaking results in the relation j_{2c}j_{dp}>>j_{1c}^2, while in standard junctions, with negligibly small pair breaking, the relation of opposite character takes place.
Similar papers
Probing interfacial pair breaking in tunnel junctions based on the first and the second harmonics of the Josephson current
similarity 0.92Yu. S. Barash
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anharmonic Josephson current in junctions with an interface pair breaking
similarity 0.89Yu. S. Barash
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson (001) tilt grain boundary junctions of high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.88Gerald B. Arnold & Richard A. Klemm · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411069
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamic structure selection and instabilities of driven Josephson lattice in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.88A. E. Koshelev & I. Aranson · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104374
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Second-harmonic current-phase relation in Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic barriers
similarity 0.88M. J. A. Stoutimore et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1805.12546
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous supercurrent modulated by interfacial magnetizations in Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic bilayers
similarity 0.88Hao Meng et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.12718
Source status unknown — claims are unverified