Dependence of carrier doping on the impurity potential in transition-metal-substituted FeAs-based superconductors
S. Ideta, T. Yoshida, I. Nishi, A. Fujimori, Y. Kotani, K. Ono, Y. Nakashima, S. Yamaichi, T. Sasagawa, M. Nakajima, K. Kihou, Y. Tomioka, C. H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, T. Ito, S. Uchida, R. Arita
arXiv:1205.1889 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.107007 · 2012-05-09 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In order to examine to what extent the rigid-band-like electron doping scenario is applicable to the transition metal-substituted Fe-based superconductors, we have performed angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy studies of Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Ni$_{x}$)$_2$As$_2$ (Ni-122) and Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Cu$_{x}$)$_2$As$_2$ (Cu-122), and compared the results with Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$)$_2$As$_2$ (Co-122). We find that Ni 3$\it{d}$-derived features are formed below the Fe 3$\it{d}$ band and that Cu 3$\it{d}$-derived ones further below it. The electron and hole Fermi surface (FS) volumes are found to increase and decrease with substitution, respectively, qualitatively consistent with the rigid-band model. However, the total extra electron number estimated from the FS volumes (the total electron FS volume minus the total hole FS volume) is found to decrease in going from Co-, Ni-, to Cu-122 for a fixed nominal extra electron number, that is, the number of electrons that participate in the formation of FS decreases with increasing impurity potential. We find that the N$\acute{\rm{e}}$el temperature $T_{\rm{N}}$ and the critical temperature $T_{\it{c}}$ maximum are determined by the FS volumes rather than the nominal extra electron concentration nor the substituted atom concentration.
Similar papers
Dependence of Carrier Doping on the Impurity Potential in Transition-Metal-Substituted FeAs-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.93S. Ideta et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
To What Extent Iron-Pnictide New Superconductors Have Been Clarified: A Progress Report
similarity 0.90Kenji Ishida et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0906.2045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Puzzle of High Temperature Superconductivity in Layered Iron Pnictides and Chalcogenides
similarity 0.90David C. Johnston · 2010 · arXiv:1005.4392
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of impurity substitution on band structure and mass renormalization of the correlated FeTeSe superconductor
similarity 0.90S. Thirupathaiah et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.07537
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge doping versus impurity scattering in chemically substituted iron-pnictides
similarity 0.89Alexander Herbig et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.06941
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of Superconductivity in the "hole-doped" Fe pnictide Ba(FeMn)As: Photoemission and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy Studies
similarity 0.89H. Suzuki et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1307.8200
Source status unknown — claims are unverified