← Back to search

Polarized neutron scattering studies of magnetic excitations in electron-overdoped superconducting BaFe$_{1.85}$Ni$_{0.15}$As$_{2}$

Mengshu Liu, C. Lester, Jiri Kulda, Xingye Lu, Huiqian Luo, Meng Wang, Stephen M. Hayden, Pengcheng Dai

arXiv:1205.3730 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.214516 · 2012-05-16 · Physical Review B

T1experimental13 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We use polarized inelastic neutron scattering to study low-energy spin excitations and their spatial anisotropy in electron-overdoped superconducting BaFe$_{1.85}$Ni$_{0.15}$As$_{2}$ ($T_c=14$ K). In the normal state, the imaginary part of the dynamic susceptibility, $χ^{\prime\prime}(Q,ω)$, at the antiferromagnetic (AF) wave vector $Q=(0.5,0.5,1)$ increases linearly with energy for $E\le 13$ meV. Upon entering the superconducting state, a spin gap opens below $E\approx 3$ meV and a broad neutron spin resonance appears at $E\approx 7$ meV. Our careful neutron polarization analysis reveals that $χ^{\prime\prime}(Q,ω)$ is isotropic for the in-plane and out-of-plane components in both the normal and superconducting states. A comparison of these results with those of undoped BaFe$_2$As$_2$ and optimally electron-doped BaFe$_{1.9}$Ni$_{0.1}$As$_{2}$ ($T_c=20$ K) suggests that the spin anisotropy observed in BaFe$_{1.9}$Ni$_{0.1}$As$_{2}$ is likely due to its proximity to the undoped BaFe$_2$As$_2$. Therefore, the neutron spin resonance is isotropic in the overdoped regime, consistent with a singlet to triplet excitation.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
BaFe1.85Ni0.15As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

14Pressure not reportedunknown
BaFe1.9Ni0.1As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers