Doping effects of Co, Ni, and Cu in FeTe0.65Se0.35 single crystals
V. L. Bezusyy, D. J. Gawryluk, M. Berkowski, M. Z. Cieplak
arXiv:1205.6295 · DOI 10.12693/APhysPolA.121.816 · 2012-05-29 · Acta Physica Polonica A
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The resistivity, magnetoresistance, and magnetic susceptibility are measured in single crystals of FeTe0.65Se0.35 with Cu, Ni, and Co substitutions for Fe. The crystals are grown by Bridgman's method. The resistivity measurements show that superconductivity disappears with the rate which correlates with the nominal valence of the impurity. From magnetoresistance we evaluate doping effect on the basic superconducting parameters, such as upper critical field and coherence length. We find indications that doping leads to two component superconducting behavior, possibly because of local charge depression around impurities.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeTe0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14.1 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| FeTe0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| FeTe0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| FeTe0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.9 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| FeTe0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| FeTe0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Fe0.99Co0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12.6 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Fe0.99Co0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Fe0.99Co0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Fe0.99Ni0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10.7 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Fe0.99Ni0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Fe0.99Ni0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Fe0.99Cu0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.3 | Pressure not reported | midpoint |
| Fe0.99Cu0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Fe0.99Cu0.01Te0.65Se0.35 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
| Fe1+δSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeTe0.5Se0.5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The electronic structure of Co-substituted superconductor probed by soft X-ray spectroscopy and density functional theory
similarity 0.90I. Perez et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1407.0746
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Possible nodal superconducting gap in Fe(TeSe) single crystals from ultra-low temperature penetration depth measurements
similarity 0.90Andrei Diaconu et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1306.0977
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
FeTeSe: a multiband superconductor in the clean and dirty limit
similarity 0.90C. C. Homes et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1502.07604
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak anisotropy of the superconducting upper critical field in Fe1.11Te0.6Se0.4 single crystals
similarity 0.90M. H. Fang et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0909.5328
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superconductivity and anisotropy of FeTe0.6Se0.4 single crystals with Li-NH3 intercalation
similarity 0.90Chenghe Li et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.05310
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum oscillations and upper critical magnetic field of the iron-based superconductor FeSe
similarity 0.89Alain Audouard et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1409.6003
Source status unknown — claims are unverified