Evidence for two-gap superconductivity in the non-centrosymmetric compound LaNiC$_2$
J. Chen, J. L. Zhang, L. Jiao, Y. Chen, L. Yang, M. Nicklas, F. Steglich, H. Q. Yuan
arXiv:1208.1596 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053005 · 2012-08-08 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the superconducting properties of the non-centrosymmetric compound LaNiC$_2$ by measuring the London penetration depth $Δλ(T)$, the specific heat $C(T,B)$ and the electrical resistivity $ρ(T,B)$. Both $Δλ(T)$ and the electronic specific heat $C_e(T)$ exhibit exponential behavior at low temperatures and can be described in terms of a phenomenological two-gap BCS model. The residual Sommerfeld coefficient in the superconducting state, $γ_0(B)$, shows a fast increase at low fields and then an eventual saturation with increasing magnetic field. A pronounced upturn curvature is observed in the upper critical field $B_{c2}(T)$ near $T_{c}$. All the experimental observations support the existence of two-gap superconductivity in LaNiC$_2$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LaNiC2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.75 | Pressure unresolved | midpoint |
| LaNiC2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.75 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| LaNiC2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.75 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| CePt3Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.75 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeIrSi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeRhSi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.05 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li2Pt3B Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li2Pd3B Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Y2C3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 16 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2C3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mg10Ir19B16 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BiPd Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaPtSi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Re3W Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ir2Ga9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Rh2Ga9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.95 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mo3Al2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 9 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ru7B3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in a new layered nickel-selenide CsNi2Se2
similarity 0.91Chen, Huimin et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1508.05167
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Specific heat evidence for two-gap superconductivity in ternary-iron silicide LuFeSi
similarity 0.91Y. Nakajima et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0801.0111
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two-gap superconductivity in LaNiGa with non-unitary triplet pairing and even parity gap symmetry
similarity 0.90Z. F. Weng et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.08356
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nodal gap structure in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor LaNiC2 from magnetic-penetration-depth measurements
similarity 0.90I. Bonalde et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1201.1649
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure effects on the unconventional superconductivity of the noncentrosymmetric LaNiC2
similarity 0.90B. Wiendlocha et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1610.04996
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Non-unitary triplet pairing in the centrosymmetric superconductor LaNiGa
similarity 0.90A. D. Hillier et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1206.5905
Source status unknown — claims are unverified