← Back to search

Electronic reconstruction and enhanced superconductivity at La$_{1.6-x}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$/La$_{1.55}$Sr$_{0.45}$CuO$_{4}$ bilayer interface

P. K. Rout, P. C. Joshi, Rajni Porwal, R. C. Budhani

arXiv:1208.3318 · DOI 10.1209/0295-5075/98/67007 · 2012-08-16 · Europhysics Letters

T1theoretical2 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report enhanced superconductivity in bilayer thin films consisting of superconducting La$_{1.6-x}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_{x}$CuO$_{4}$ with 0.06 $\leq x<$ 0.20 and metallic but non-superconducting La$_{1.55}$Sr$_{0.45}$CuO$_{4}$. These bilayers show a maximum increase in superconducting transition temperature ($T_c$) of more than 200% for $x$ = 0.06 while no change in $T_c$ is observed for the bilayers with $x\geq$ 0.20. The analysis of the critical current and kinetic inductance data suggests 2-3 unit cells thick interfacial layer electronically perturbed to have a higher $T_c$. A simple charge transfer model with cation intermixing explains the observed $T_c$ in bilayers. Still the unusually large thickness of interfacial superconducting layers can not be explained in terms of this model. We believe the stripe relaxation as well as the proximity effect also influence the superconductivity of the interface.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.48Nd0.4Sr0.12CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

9Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers