Bounding the pseudogap with a line of phase transitions in YBCO cuprate superconductors
Arkady Shekhter, B. J. Ramshaw, Ruixing Liang, W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, Fedor F. Balakirev, Ross D. McDonald, Jon B. Betts, Scott C. Riggs, Albert Migliori
arXiv:1208.5810 · DOI 10.1038/nature12165 · 2012-08-28
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Close to optimal doping, the copper oxide superconductors show 'strange metal' behavior, suggestive of strong fluctuations associated with a quantum critical point. Such a critical point requires a line of classical phase transitions terminating at zero temperature near optimal doping inside the superconducting 'dome'. The underdoped region of the temperature-doping phase diagram from which superconductivity emerges is referred to as the 'pseudogap' because evidence exists for partial gapping of the conduction electrons, but so far there is no compelling thermodynamic evidence as to whether the pseudogap is a distinct phase or a continuous evolution of physical properties on cooling. Here we report that the pseudogap in YBCO cuprate superconductors is a distinct phase, bounded by a line of phase transitions. The doping dependence of this line is such that it terminates at zero temperature inside the superconducting dome. From this we conclude that quantum criticality drives the strange metallic behavior and therefore superconductivity in the cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O6.60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O6.98 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Thermodynamic signature of a phase transition in the pseudogap phase of high- superconductor
similarity 0.91B. Leridon et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.2128
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantized Repetitions of the Cuprate Pseudogap Line
similarity 0.91Vincent Sacksteder · 2018 · arXiv:1805.10912
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Field determination of superconducting fluctuations in high-Tc cuprates
similarity 0.91F. Rullier-Albenque et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.5205
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
17O-NMR Knight shift study of the interplay between superconductivity and pseudogap in (Ca_xLa_{1-x})(Ba_{1.75 - x}La_{0.25 + x})Cu_3O_y
similarity 0.91T. Cvitanic et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1403.5574
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Photoemission perspective on pseudogap, superconducting fluctuations, and charge order in cuprates: a review of recent progress
similarity 0.91Inna Vishik · 2018 · arXiv:1803.11228
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting the electronic phase diagram of YBa2Cu3Oy via temperature derivative of in-plane resistivity
similarity 0.90Yue Wang & Jun Zhang · 2017 · arXiv:1711.07402
Source status unknown — claims are unverified