Electronic tuning and uniform superconductivity in CeCoIn5
K. Gofryk, F. Ronning, J. -X. Zhu, M. N. Ou, P. H. Tobash, S. S. Stoyko, X. Lu, A. Mar, T. Park, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk
arXiv:1210.0672 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.186402 · 2012-10-02 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report a globally reversible effect of electronic tuning on the magnetic phase diagram in CeCoIn_{5} driven by electron (Pt and Sn) and hole (Cd, Hg) doping. Consequently, we are able to extract the superconducting pair breaking component for hole and electron dopants with pressure and co-doping studies, respectively. We find that these nominally non-magnetic dopants have a remarkably weak pair breaking effect for a d-wave superconductor. The pair breaking is weaker for hole dopants, which induce magnetic moments, than for electron dopants. Furthermore, both Pt and Sn doping have a similar effect on superconductivity despite being on different dopant sites, arguing against the notion that superconductivity lives predominantly in the CeIn_{3} planes of these materials. In addition, we shed qualitative understanding on the doping dependence with density functional theory calculations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCoIn5-xSnx Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| CeCo1-xPtxIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.2 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Electronic Tuning and Uniform Superconductivity in CeCoIn5
similarity 0.91K. Gofryk et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
In Situ STM Observation of Nonmagnetic Impurity Effect in MBE-grown CeCoIn Films
similarity 0.91Masahiro Haze et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1802.01230
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin resonance in the d-wave superconductor CeCoIn5
similarity 0.90C. Stock et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0712.0172
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and Quantum Criticality in CeCoIn_5
similarity 0.90V. A. Sidorov et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0202251
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous effect of doping on the superconducting state of CeCoIn5 in high magnetic fields
similarity 0.90Y. Tokiwa et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coupling between heavy fermion superconductor CeCoIn and antiferromagnetic metal CeIn through the atomic interface
similarity 0.89M. Naritsuka et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1904.06937
Source status unknown — claims are unverified