Gradiometric flux qubits with tunable gap
M. J. Schwarz, J. Goetz, Z. Jiang, T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, A. Marx, R. Gross
arXiv:1210.3982 · DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/15/4/045001 · 2012-10-15 · New Journal of Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
For gradiometric three-Josephson-junction flux qubits, we perform a systematic study on the tuning of the minimal transition frequency, the so-called qubit gap. By replacing one of the qubit's Josephson junctions by a dc SQUID, the critical current of this SQUID and, in turn, the qubit gap can be tuned in situ by a control flux threading the SQUID loop. We present spectroscopic measurements demonstrating a well-defined controllability of the qubit gap between zero and more than 10 GHz. In the future, this enables one to tune the qubit into and out of resonance with other superconducting quantum circuits, while operating the qubit at its symmetry point with optimal dephasing properties. The experimental data agree very well with model calculations based on the full qubit Hamiltonian. From a numerical fit, we determine the Josephson coupling and the charging energies of the qubit junctions. The derived values agree well with those measured for other junctions fabricated on the same chip. We also demonstrate the biasing of gradiometric flux qubits near the symmetry point by trapping an odd number of flux quanta in the gradiometer loop. In this way, we study the effect of the significant kinetic inductance, thereby obtaining valuable information for the qubit design.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Charge-SQUID and Tunable Phase-slip Flux Qubit
similarity 0.89Hu Zhao et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.5166
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Intrinsic leakage of the Josephson flux qubit and breakdown of the two-level approximation for strong driving
similarity 0.88Alejandro Ferron & Daniel Dominguez · 2009 · arXiv:0910.5640
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent Operation of a Gap-tunable Flux Qubit
similarity 0.88Xiaobo Zhu et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.4016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Parametric control of a superconducting flux qubit
similarity 0.88S. Saito et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508448
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robust strong coupling architecture in circuit quantum electrodynamics
similarity 0.88Rishabh Upadhyay et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2107.11135
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strong Coupling of a Quantum Oscillator to a Flux Qubit at its Symmetry Point
similarity 0.87Fedorov, A. et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1004.1560
Source status unknown — claims are unverified