Why there is a difference between optimal doping for maximal Tc and critical doping for highest ρ_s in cuprate superconductors?
Zheyu Huang, Huaisong Zhao, Shiping Feng
arXiv:1210.6143 · DOI 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.04.024 · 2012-10-23 · Solid State Communications
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A long-standing puzzle is why there is a difference between the optimal doping δ_{optimal}=0.15 for the maximal superconducting (SC) transition temperature Tc and the critical doping δ_{critical}=0.19 for the highest superfluid density ρ_s in cuprate superconductors? This puzzle is calling for an explanation. Within the kinetic energy driven SC mechanism, it is shown that except the quasiparticle coherence, ρ_s is dominated by the bare pair gap, while Tc is set by the effective pair gap. By calculation of the ratio of the effective and the bare pair gaps, it is shown that the coupling strength decreases with increasing doping. This doping dependence of the coupling strength induces a shift from the critical doping for the maximal value of the bare pair gap parameter to the optimal doping for the maximal value of the effective pair gap parameter, which leads to a difference between the optimal doping for the maximal Tc and the critical doping for the highest ρ_s.
Similar papers
Pseudogap-induced asymmetric tunneling in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.92Lulin Kuang et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.1896
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of electromagnetic response in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.92Yiqun Liu et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1907.00663
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between charge order and superconductivity in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.92Deheng Gao et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1803.07432
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of Meissner effect in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Shiping Feng et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.1472
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic field induced reduction of the low-temperature superfluid density in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Zheyu Huang et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1011.1546
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of electromagnetic response in electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91Zheyu Huang et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.6225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified