Andreev-reflection spectroscopy with superconducting indium - a case study
Kurt Gloos, Elina Tuuli
arXiv:1211.4084 · DOI 10.1063/1.4794999 · 2012-11-17 · Low Temperature Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have investigated Andreev reflection at interfaces between superconducting indium (T_c = 3.4 K) and several normal conducting non-magnetic metals (palladium, platinum, and silver) down to T = 0.1 K as well as zinc (T_c = 0.87 K) in its normal state at T = 2.5 K. We analysed the point-contact spectra with the modified one-dimensional BTK theory valid for ballistic transport. It includes Dynes' quasi-particle lifetime as fitting parameter Gamma in addition to superconducting energy gap 2Delta and strength Z of the interface barrier. For contact areas from less than 1 nm^2 to 10000 nm^2 the BTK Z-parameter was close to 0.5, corresponding to transmission coefficients of about 80%, independent of the normal metal. The Z-parameter varies by less than +/-0.1 around its average value, indicating that the interfaces have a negligible dielectric tunneling barrier. Also Fermi surface mismatch does not account for the observed Z. The extracted value Z approx 0.5 can be explained by assuming that practically all of our point contacts are in the diffusive regime.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Evidence for two superconducting energy gaps in MgB2 by point-contact spectroscopy
similarity 0.88P. Szabo et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0105598
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron and hole transmission through superconductor - normal metal interfaces
similarity 0.88Kurt Gloos & Elina Tuuli · 2012 · arXiv:1209.2629
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev Reflection in Narrow Ferromagnet/Superconductor Point Contacts
similarity 0.88Keiichirou Kikuchi et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0107588
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transport properties of an electron-hole bilayer/superconductor hybrid junction
similarity 0.87D. Bercioux et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1703.10510
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing Spin Polarization with Andreev Reflection: A Theoretical Basis
similarity 0.87I. I. Mazin et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0010326
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection and order parameter symmetry in heavy-fermion superconductors: the case of CeCoIn
similarity 0.87Wan Kyu Park & Laura H. Greene · 2009 · arXiv:0902.1009
Source status unknown — claims are unverified