Effects of isoelectronic Ru substitution at the Fe site on the energy gaps of optimally F-doped SmFeAsO
D. Daghero, M. Tortello, G. A. Ummarino, V. A. Stepanov, F. Bernardini, M. Tropeano, M. Putti, R. S. Gonnelli
arXiv:1301.3757 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/25/8/084012 · 2013-01-16 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We studied the effects of isoelectronic Ru substitution at the Fe site on the energy gaps of optimally F-doped SmFeAsO by means of point-contact Andreev reflection spectroscopy. The results show that the SmFe_{1-x}Ru_{x}AsO_{0.85}F_{0.15} system keeps a multigap character at least up to x=0.50, and that the gap amplitudes Delta_1 and Delta_2 scale almost linearly with the local critical temperature TcA. The gap ratios 2Delta_i/(kB Tc) remain approximately constant only as long as Tc > 30 K, but increase dramatically when Tc decreases further. This trend seems to be common to many Fe-based superconductors, irrespective of their family. Based on first-principle calculations of the bandstructure and of the density of states projected on the different bands, we show that this trend, as well as the Tc dependence of the gaps and the reduction of Tc upon Ru doping, can be explained within an effective three-band Eliashberg model as being due to a suppression of the superfluid density at finite temperature that, in turns, modifies the temperature dependence of the characteristic spin-fluctuation energy.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmFeAsO0.85F0.15 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 52 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sm(Fe0.5Ru0.5)AsO0.85F0.15 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Point contact spectroscopy in Fe-based superconductors: recent advancements and future challenges
similarity 0.91R. S. Gonnelli et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1312.2527
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for two-gap nodeless superconductivity in SmFeAsOF from point-contact Andreev-reflection spectroscopy
similarity 0.89D. Daghero et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0812.1141
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin fluctuation-mediated unconventional superconductivity in ThFeAsN from first-principles
similarity 0.89Guang-Yu Guo et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.14677
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evolution of Superconducting Gaps in Th-Substituted SmThOFeAs Studied by Multiple Andreev Reflection Spectroscopy
similarity 0.89T. E. Kuzmicheva et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1612.04303
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Status of Iron Based Superconductors: characteristics and relevant properties for applications
similarity 0.89Iida, Kazumasa · 2025 · arXiv:2502.17063
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiple Andreev reflections spectroscopy of two-gap 1111- and 11 Fe-based superconductors
similarity 0.88Ya. G. Ponomarev et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1302.5320
Source status unknown — claims are unverified