T_c of disordered superconductors near the Anderson transition
I. M. Suslov
arXiv:1301.3829 · DOI 10.1134/S1063776113140057 · 2013-01-15 · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
According to the Anderson theorem, the critical temperature T_c of a disordered superconductor is determined by the average density of states and does not change at the localization threshold. This statement is valid under assumption of a self-averaging order parameter, which can be violated in the strong localization region. Stimulating by statements on the essential increase of T_c near the Anderson transition, we carried out the systematic investigation of possible violations of self-averaging. Strong deviations from the Anderson theorem are possible due to resonances at the quasi-discrete levels, resulting in localization of the order parameter at the atomic scale. This effect is determined by the properties of individual impurities and has no direct relation to the Anderson transition. In particular, we see no reasons to say on "fractal superconductivity" near the localization threshold.
Similar papers
Quantum Fluctuations and Multifractally-Enhanced Superconductivity in Disordered Thin Films
similarity 0.91E. S. Andriyakhina et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.08693
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of impurities with retarded interaction with quasiparticles upon critical temperature of s-wave superconductor
similarity 0.90K. V. Grigorishin & B. I. Lev · 2013 · arXiv:1304.0113
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unexpected impact of magnetic disorder on multiband superconductivity
similarity 0.90M. M. Korshunov et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1410.0832
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in disordered thin films: giant mesoscopic fluctuations
similarity 0.90M. A. Skvortsov & M. V. Feigel'man · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0504002
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak Localization Effect in Superconductors
similarity 0.90Yong-Jihn Kim & K. J. Chang · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9706032
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancement of superconductivity by Anderson localization
similarity 0.89I. S. Burmistrov et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1102.3323
Source status unknown — claims are unverified