Phase fluctuations versus Gaussian fluctuations in optimally-doped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$
Lu Li, Yayu Wang, N. P. Ong
arXiv:1301.7333 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.056502 · 2013-01-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze recent torque measurements of the magnetization $M_d$ vs. magnetic field $H$ in optimally doped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-y}$ (OPT YBCO) to argue against a recent proposal by Rey et al that the magnetization results above $T_c$ are consistent with Gaussian fluctuations. We find that, despite its strong interlayer coupling, OPT YBCO displays an anomalous non-monotonic dependence of $M_d$ on $H$ which represents direct evidence for the locking of the pair wavefunction phase $θ_n$ at $T_c$ and the subsequent unlocking by a relatively weak $H$. These unusual features characterize the unusual nature of the transition to the Meissner state in cuprate superconductors. They are absent in low-$T_c$ superconductors to our knowledge. We also stress the importance of the vortex liquid state, as well as the profiles of the melting field $H_m(T)$ and the upper critical field curve $H_{c2}(T)$ in the $T$-$H$ plane. Contrary to the claims of Rey et al, we show that the curves of the magnetization and the Nernst signal illustrate the inaccessibility of the $H_{c2}$ line near $T_c$. The prediction of the $H_{c2}$ line by Rey et al is shown to be invalid in OPT YBCO.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 92.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Vorticity and the Nernst Effect in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.91N. P. Ong et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0312213
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Inhomogeneous Magnetic-Field Response of YBa2Cu3Oy and La2-xSrxCuO4 Persisting above the Bulk Superconducting Transition Temperature
similarity 0.90J. E. Sonier et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0801.3481
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High Field determination of superconducting fluctuations in high-Tc cuprates
similarity 0.90F. Rullier-Albenque et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.5205
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous doping dependence of the fluctuation-induced diamagnetism in superconductors of YBCO family
similarity 0.90A. Lascialfari et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110019
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to “Comment on ‘Diamagnetism and Cooper pairing above Tc in cuprates' ”
similarity 0.90Lu Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuating diamagnetism in underdoped high temperature superconductors
similarity 0.89Alain Sewer & Hans Beck · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0104193
Source status unknown — claims are unverified