Tight-binding description of intrinsic superconducting correlations in multilayer graphene
W. A. Munoz, L. Covaci, F. M. Peeters
arXiv:1302.1073 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.134509 · 2013-02-05 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Using highly efficient GPU-based simulations of the tight-binding Bogoliubov-de Gennes equations we solve self-consistently for the pair correlation in rhombohedral (ABC) and Bernal (ABA) multilayer graphene by considering a finite intrinsic s-wave pairing potential. We find that the two different stacking configurations have opposite bulk/surface behavior for the order parameter. Surface superconductivity is robust for ABC stacked multilayer graphene even at very low pairing potentials for which the bulk order parameter vanishes, in agreement with a recent analytical approach. In contrast, for Bernal stacked multilayer graphene, we find that the order parameter is always suppressed at the surface and that there exists a critical value for the pairing potential below which no superconducting order is achieved. We considered different doping scenarios and find that homogeneous doping strongly suppresses surface superconductivity while non-homogeneous field-induced doping has a much weaker effect on the superconducting order parameter. For multilayer structures with hybrid stacking (ABC and ABA) we find that when the thickness of each region is small (few layers), high-temperature surface superconductivity survives throughout the bulk due to the proximity effect between ABC/ABA interfaces where the order parameter is enhanced.
Similar papers
Tight-binding description of intrinsic superconducting correlations in multilayer graphene
similarity 0.95W. A. Muñoz et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in graphene under inhomogeneous strain
similarity 0.93Lucian Covaci & Francois Peeters · 2011 · arXiv:1111.4556
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex states in nanoscale superconducting squares: the influence of quantum confinement
similarity 0.92L. -F. Zhang et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.7153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological phase transitions in small mesoscopic chiral p-wave superconductors
similarity 0.90L. -F. Zhang et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.08440
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Symmetry of superconducting correlations in displaced bilayers of graphene
similarity 0.90Mohammad Alidoust et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.11623
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tight-binding study of bilayer graphene Josephson junctions
similarity 0.90W. A. Muñoz et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1207.4007
Source status unknown — claims are unverified