Comment on `Vacuum Rabi Splitting in a Semiconductor Circuit QED System' by Toida et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 066802 - Published 6 February 2013
A. Wallraff, A. Stockklauser, T. Ihn, J. R. Petta, A. Blais
arXiv:1304.3697 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.249701 · 2013-04-12 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Toida et al. claim in their recent article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 066802 (2013)] that they `report a direct observation of vacuum Rabi splitting in a GaAs/AlGaAs double quantum dot (DQD) based charge qubit coupled with a superconducting coplanar waveguide (CPW) resonator'. In this comment, we challenge the main claims made in their paper and show that their results: a) do not provide any evidence of vacuum Rabi oscillations and b) do not provide any direct evidence of vacuum Rabi splitting.
Similar papers
RFSQUID-Mediated Coherent Tunable Coupling Between a Superconducting Phase Qubit and a Lumped Element Resonator
similarity 0.86M. S. Allman et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.0816
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Broken selection rule in the quantum Rabi model
similarity 0.86P. Forn-Díaz et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.03379
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermal Excitation of Multi-Photon Dressed States in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
similarity 0.85J. M. Fink et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0911.3797
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlinear response of the vacuum Rabi resonance
similarity 0.85Lev S. Bishop et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0807.2882
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
All-Microwave Control and Dispersive Readout of Gate-Defined Quantum Dot Qubits in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics
similarity 0.85P. Scarlino et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1711.01906
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics: Coherent Coupling of a Single Photon to a Cooper Pair Box
similarity 0.84A. Wallraff et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0407325
Source status unknown — claims are unverified