Do organic and other exotic superconductors fail universal scaling relations?
S. V. Dordevic, D. N. Basov, C. C. Homes
arXiv:1305.0019 · DOI 10.1038/srep01713 · 2013-04-30 · Scientific Reports
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Universal scaling relations are of tremendous importance in science, as they reveal fundamental laws of nature. Several such scaling relations have recently been proposed for superconductors; however, they are not really universal in the sense that some important families of superconductors appear to fail the scaling relations, or obey the scaling with different scaling pre-factors. In particular, a large group of materials called organic (or molecular) superconductors are a notable example. Here, we show that such apparent violations are largely due to the fact that the required experimental parameters were collected on different samples, with different experimental techniques. When experimental data is taken on the same sample, using a single experimental technique, organic superconductors, as well as all other studied superconductors, do in fact follow universal scaling relations.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu(NCS)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu(NCS)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2I3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Br Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| (BEDT-TTF)2Cu(NCS)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8.3 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| K3C60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 19 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Rb3C60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 29 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeCoIn5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TlxPb1-xTe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.47 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.24 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 0.74 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Y2C2I2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| TiN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3.4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Universal scaling relations in molecular superconductors
similarity 0.87F. L. Pratt & S. J. Blundell · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411754
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scaling of the superfluid density in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.87C. C. Homes et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410719
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal scaling relation in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.87C. C. Homes et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404216
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal Scaling Relations in Molecular Superconductors
similarity 0.87F. L. Pratt & S. J. Blundell
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conventional mechanisms for "exotic" superconductivity
similarity 0.87D. F. Agterberg et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9906394
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic Field induced Dimensional Crossover Phenomena in Cuprate Superconductors and their Implications
similarity 0.87T. Schneider & J. M. Singer · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9812082
Source status unknown — claims are unverified