Asymptotic Expressions for Charge Matrix Elements of the Fluxonium Circuit
Guanyu Zhu, Jens Koch
arXiv:1305.3965 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.144518 · 2013-05-17 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In charge-coupled circuit QED systems, transition amplitudes and dispersive shifts are governed by the matrix elements of the charge operator. For the fluxonium circuit, these matrix elements are not limited to nearest-neighbor energy levels and are conveniently tunable by magnetic flux. Previously, their values were largely obtained numerically. Here, we present analytical expressions for the fluxonium charge matrix elements. We show that new selection rules emerge in the asymptotic limit of large Josephson energy and small inductive energy. We illustrate the usefulness of our expressions for the qualitative understanding of charge matrix elements in the parameter regime probed by previous experiments.
Similar papers
Scalable High-Performance Fluxonium Quantum Processor
similarity 0.88Long B. Nguyen et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.09374
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Protecting a superconducting qubit from energy decay by selection rule engineering
similarity 0.87Yen-Hsiang Lin et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1705.07873
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticles in superconducting qubits with asymmetric junctions
similarity 0.86Giampiero Marchegiani et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.06056
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Floquet Majorana bound states in voltage-biased Planar Josephson Junctions
similarity 0.86Changnan Peng et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2011.06000
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Low-decoherence flux qubit
similarity 0.86J. Q. You et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0609225
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resilience of the quantum critical line in the Schmid transition
similarity 0.86Nicolas Paris et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2407.01699
Source status unknown — claims are unverified