← Back to search

Why $T_c$ of (CaFeAs)$_{10}$Pt$_{3.58}$As$_8$ is twice as high as (CaFe$_{0.95}$Pt$_{0.05}$As)$_{10}$Pt$_3$As$_8$

S. Thirupathaiah, T. Stürzer, V. B. Zabolotnyy, D. Johrendt, B. Büchner, S. V. Borisenko

arXiv:1307.1608 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.140505 · 2013-07-05 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical26 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Recently discovered (CaFe$_{1-x}$Pt$_x$As)$_{10}$Pt$_3$As$_8$ and (CaFeAs)$_{10}$Pt$_{4-y}$As$_8$ superconductors are very similar materials having the same elemental composition and structurally similar superconducting FeAs slabs. Yet the maximal critical temperature achieved by changing Pt concentration is approximately twice higher in the latter. Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy(ARPES) we compare the electronic structure of their optimally doped compounds and find drastic differences. Our results highlight the sensitivity of critical temperature to the details of fermiology and point to the decisive role of band-edge singularities in the mechanism of high-$T_c$ superconductivity.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
(CaFeAs)10Pt3.58As8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

35Pressure not reportedunknown
(CaFe0.95Pt0.05As)10Pt3As8

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

15Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers