← Back to search

Superconducting energy gap versus pseudogap in hole-doped cuprates as revealed by infrared spectroscopy

T. Dong, F. Zhou, N. L. Wang

arXiv:1308.6170 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.184507 · 2013-08-28 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical3 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We present in-plane infrared reflectance measurement on two superconducting cuprates with relatively low T$_c$: a nearly optimally-doped Bi$_2$Sr$_{1.6}$La$_{0.4}$CuO$_{6+δ}$ with T$_c$=33 K and an underdoped La$_{1.89}$Sr$_{0.11}$CuO$_4$ with T$_c$=30 K. The measurement clearly reveals that the superconducting energy gap is distinct from the pseudogap. They have different energy scales and appear at different temperatures. The results suggest that the pseudogap is not a precursor to the superconducting state. The data also challenge the longstanding viewpoint that the superconductivity within the ab-plane is in the clean limit and the superconducting pairing energy gap could not be detected by in-plane infrared spectroscopy.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr1.6La0.4CuO6+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

33Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.89Sr0.11CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers