Ripple field losses in DC biased superconductors: simulations and comparison with measurements
V. Lahtinen, E. Pardo, J. Šouc, M. Solovyov, A. Stenvall
arXiv:1308.6757 · DOI 10.1063/1.4868898 · 2013-08-30 · Journal of Applied Physics
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
For example in some supercondcuting generators, motors and power transmission cables the superconductor experiences a changing magnetic field in a DC background. Simulating the losses caused by this AC ripple field is an important task from the application design point of view. In this work, we compare two formulations, the $H$-formulation and the minimum magnetic energy variation (the MMEV-formulation), based on the eddy current model (ECM) and the critical state model (CSM), respectively, in simulating ripple field losses in a DC biased coated conductor tape. Furthermore, we compare our simulation results with measurements. We investigate the frequency-dependence of the hysteresis loss predictions of the power law based ECM and verify by a measurement, that in DC use, ECM clearly over-estimates the homogenization of the current density profile in the coated conductor tape: the relaxation of the local current density is not nearly as prominent in the measurement as it is in the simulation. Hence, we suggest that the power law resistivity, used as the \emph{local} relation between the electric field intensity ${\bf E}$ and current density ${\bf J}$ in ECM, is not an intrinsic property of high-temperature superconductors. The difference between the models manifests itself as discrepancies in ripple field loss simulations in very low AC fields with significant DC fields or currents involved. The results also show, however, that for many practical situations, CSM and ECM are both eligible models for ripple field loss simulations.
Similar papers
Influence of the voltage taps position on the self-field DC and AC transport characterization of HTS superconducting tapes
similarity 0.88M. Vojenciak et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.3045
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Review of the AC Loss Computation for HTS using the H-formulation
similarity 0.87Boyang Shen et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1908.02176
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hysteretic ac loss of superconducting strips simultaneously exposed to ac transport current and phase-different ac magnetic field
similarity 0.87Yasunori Mawatari & Kazuhiro Kajikawa · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0612072
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hysteretic ac loss in a coated superconductor subjected to oscillating magnetic field: ferromagnetic effect and frequency dependence
similarity 0.87Guang-Tong Ma · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6071
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current distribution and ac loss for a superconducting rectangular strip with in phase alternating current and applied field
similarity 0.87E. Pardo et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0510314
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic properties of superconducting multifilamentary tapes in perpendicular field. I: Model and vertical stacks
similarity 0.87Alvaro Sanchez et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0207702
Source status unknown — claims are unverified