Silicene and Germanene as prospective playgrounds for Room Temperature Superconductivity
G. Baskaran
arXiv:1309.2242 · DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-72374-7_5 · 2013-09-09 · arXiv: Strongly Correlated Electrons
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Combining theory and certain striking phenomenology we suggest that silicene and germanene are \textit{elemental Mott insulators} and abode of doping induced high Tc superconductivity. In our theory, a 3 fold reduction in silicene $π- π^*$ band width, in comparison to graphene, and short range coulomb interactions enable Mott localization. Recent experimental results are invoked to provide support for our Mott insulator model: i) a significant $π$-band narrowing, in silicene on ZrB$_2$ seen in ARPES, ii) a superconducting gap appearing below 35 K with a large $\frac{2Δ}{k_BTc}\sim$ 20 in silicene on Ag, iii) emergence of electron like pockets at M points, on electron doping by Na adsorbent, iv) certain coherent quantum oscillation like features exhibited by silicene transistor at room temperatures and v) absence of Landau level splitting upto 7 Tesla and vi) superstructures, not common in graphene but, ubiquitous in silicene. A synthesis of the above results using theory of Mott insulator, with and without doping, is attempted. We surmise that if competing orders are taken care of and optimal doping achieved, superconductivity in silicene and germanene could reach room temperature scales; our estimates of model parameters, t and J $\sim$ 1 eV, are encouragingly high, compared to cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 300 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ge Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 300 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 200 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Spin-charge separation and unconventional superconductivity in the t−J model on the honeycomb lattice
similarity 0.87Jian-Jian Miao et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Singlet Reservoir Theory of Ambient Tc Granular Superconductivity in Monovalent Metal Nanostructures
similarity 0.86G. Baskaran · 2019 · arXiv:1906.02143
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Two Mott Insulator Theory of Superconductivity in KX (X: picene, .. p-terphenyl, .. C)
similarity 0.86G. Baskaran · 2017 · arXiv:1704.08153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological Superconductivity in Sn/Si(111) driven by non-local Coulomb interactions
similarity 0.85Mehdi Biderang et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2205.07397
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in silicon: a review
similarity 0.85Monika Moun & Goutam Sheet · 2021 · arXiv:2108.03031
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
RVB States in doped Band Insulators from Coloumb forces: Theory and a case study of Superconductivity in BiS Layers
similarity 0.85G. Baskaran · 2016 · arXiv:1603.02819
Source status unknown — claims are unverified