Non-Landau damping of magnetic excitations in systems with localized and itinerant electrons
Andrey V. Chubukov, Joseph J. Betouras, Dmitry V. Efremov
arXiv:1309.7065 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.037202 · 2013-09-26 · Physical review letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We discuss the form of the damping of magnetic excitations in a metal near a ferromagnetic instability. The paramagnon theory predicts that the damping term should have the form $Ω/Γ(q)$ with $Γ(q) \propto q$ (the Landau damping). However, the experiments on uranium metallic compounds UGe$_2$ and UCoGe showed that $Γ(q)$ tends to a constant value at vanishing $q$. A non-zero $Γ(0)$ is impossible in systems with one type of carriers (either localized or itinerant) because it would violate the spin conservation. It has been conjectured recently that a non-zero $Γ(q)$ in UGe$_2$ and UCoGe may be due to the presence of both localized and itinerant electrons in these materials, with ferromagnetism involving predominantly localized spins. We present microscopic analysis of the damping of near-critical localized excitations due to interaction with itinerant carriers. We show explicitly how the presence of two types of electrons breaks the cancellation between the contributions to $Γ(0)$ from self-energy and vertex correction insertions into the spin polarization bubble and discuss the special role of the Aslamazov-Larkin processes. We show that $Γ(0)$ increases with $T$ both in the paramagnetic and ferromagnetic regions, but in-between it has a peak at $T_c$. We compare our theory with the available experimental data.
Similar papers
Spin current injection at magnetic insulator/superconductor interfaces
similarity 0.90Vinícius S. U. A. Vargas & Antônio R. Moura · 2020 · arXiv:2005.06435
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unique properties of the optical activity in noncentrosymmetric superconductors: sum rule, missing area, and relation with the superconducting Edelstein effect
similarity 0.88Koki Shinada & Robert Peters · 2023 · arXiv:2308.01786
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Mechanisms for Magnetic Skyrmion Catalysis and Topological Superconductivity
similarity 0.87Yun-Peng Huang & Panagiotis Kotetes · 2022 · arXiv:2208.07964
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Amperean superconductivity cannot be induced by deep subwavelength cavities in a two-dimensional material
similarity 0.87Gian Marcello Andolina et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.10371
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic self-energy and triplet pairing fluctuations in the vicinity of a ferromagnetic instability in 2D systems: the quasistatic approach
similarity 0.87A. A. Katanin · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0501331
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Crossed Andreev reflection and spin-resolved non-local electron transport
similarity 0.87Mikhail S. Kalenkov & Andrei D. Zaikin · 2011 · arXiv:1110.3654
Source status unknown — claims are unverified