Ion-size effects on cuprate High Temperature Superconductors
Benjamin P P Mallett
arXiv:1310.3055 · DOI 10.26686/wgtn.17005447 · 2013-10-11 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
There are two general ways to compress the cuprates, by external pressure or by internal pressure as induced by isovalent-ion substitution. Paradoxically, they have the opposite effect on the superconducting transition temperature. This thesis seeks to understand the salient difference between these two pressures. We study three families of cuprates where the ion size can be systematically altered; Bi$_2$(Sr$_{1.6-x}$A$_x$)Ln$_{0.4}$CuO$_{6+ δ}$, ACuO$_2 $ and LnBa$_{2-x} $Sr$_x $Cu$_3 $O$_{7-δ} $ where Ln is a Lanthenide or Y and A=\{Mg,Ca,Sr,Ba\}. We use a variety of techniques to explore our paradox, for example; Raman spectroscopy to measure the antiferromagnetic exchange energy and energy gaps, Density Functional Theory to calculate the density of states, Muon Spin Relaxation to measure the superfluid density as well as a variety of more conventional techniques to synthesize and characterise our samples. Our Raman studies show that an energy scale for spin fluctuations cannot resolve the different effects of the two pressures. Similarly the density of states, while an important property, does not clearly resolve the paradox. Our superfluid density measurements show that the disorder resulting from isovalent-ion substitution is secondary in importance for the superconducting transition temperature. Instead, we find that the polarisability is a key property of the cuprates with regard to superconductivity. This understanding resolves the paradox! It implies that electron pairing results from either (i) a short-range interaction where the polarisability screens repulsive longer-range interactions and/or (ii) the relatively unexplored idea of the exchange of quantized, coherent polarisation waves. More generally, we have also demonstrated the utility of studying ion-size effects to further our collective understanding of the cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YbBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 94.5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Raman Scattering in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.89T. P. Devereaux & A. P. Kampf · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9702186
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
C-axis lattice dynamics in Bi-based cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88N. N. Kovaleva et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307509
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disorder and superfluid density in overdoped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.88N. R. Lee-Hone et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1704.04803
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analysis of Magnetic Field-Angle Dependent Electronic Raman Scattering to Probe the Superconducting Gap
similarity 0.88Masaru Okada & Nobuhiko Hayashi · 2013 · arXiv:1310.1202
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The High Temperature Superconductivity in Cuprates
similarity 0.88Paolo Cea · 2011 · arXiv:1104.1857
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Three energy scales in the superconducting state of hole-doped cuprates detected by electronic Raman scattering
similarity 0.88S. Benhabib et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1506.08104
Source status unknown — claims are unverified