Phase diagram and optical conductivity of La1.8-xEu0.2SrxCuO4
M. Autore, P. Di Pietro, P. Calvani, U. Schade, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, S. Lupi
arXiv:1310.8210 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.035102 · 2013-10-30 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
La1.8-xEu0.2SrxCuO4 (LESCO) is the member of the 214 family which exhibits the largest intervals among the structural, charge ordering (CO), magnetic, and superconducting transition temperatures. By using new dc transport measurements and data in the literature we construct the phase diagram of LESCO between x = 0.8 and 0.20. This phase diagram has been further probed in ac, by measuring the optical conductivity σ1(ω) of three single crystals with x = 0.11, 0.125, and 0.16 between 10 and 300 K in order to associate the extra-Drude peaks often observed in the 214 family with a given phase. The far-infrared peak we detect in underdoped LESCO is the hardest among them, survives up to room temperature and is associated with charge localization rather than with ordering. At the CO transition for the commensurate doping x = 0.125 instead the extra-Drude peak hardens and a pseudogap opens in σ1(ω), approximately as wide as the maximum superconducting gap of LSCO.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.69Eu0.2Sr0.11CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.675Eu0.2Sr0.125CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.64Eu0.2Sr0.16CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 14 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Phase diagram of charge order in La1.8-xEu0.2SrxCuO4 from resonant soft x-ray diffraction
similarity 0.93Jörg Fink et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1011.5101
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Distribution of the magnetic environment in charge ordered LaSrCuO
similarity 0.91A. Arsenault et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.11448
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resonant X-ray Scattering Study of Charge Density Wave Correlations in YBaCuO
similarity 0.91S. Blanco-Canosa et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1406.1595
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Optical conductivity of the nonsuperconducting cuprate La(8-x)Sr(x)Cu(8)O(20)
similarity 0.90A. Lucarelli et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0106402
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fate of charge order in overdoped La-based cuprates
similarity 0.90K. von Arx et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2206.06695
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting Cu63 NMR evidence for charge order in superconducting La1.885Sr0.115CuO4
similarity 0.90T. Imai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified