High Fidelity Qubit Readout with the Superconducting Low-Inductance Undulatory Galvanometer Microwave Amplifier
D. Hover, S. Zhu, T. Thorbeck, G. J. Ribeill, D. Sank, J. Kelly, R. Barends, John M. Martinis, R. McDermott
arXiv:1312.7579 · DOI 10.1063/1.4871088 · 2013-12-29 · Applied Physics Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We describe the high fidelity dispersive measurement of a superconducting qubit using a microwave amplifier based on the Superconducting Low-inductance Undulatory Galvanometer (SLUG). The SLUG preamplifier achieves gain of 19 dB and yields a signal-to-noise ratio improvement of 9 dB over a state-of-the-art HEMT amplifier. We demonstrate a separation fidelity of 99% at 700 ns compared to 59% with the HEMT alone. The SLUG displays a large dynamic range, with an input saturation power corresponding to 700 photons in the readout cavity.
Similar papers
Generation and efficient measurement of single photons from fixed-frequency superconducting qubits
similarity 0.89William F. Kindel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Input Impedance and Gain of a Gigahertz Amplifier Using a DC SQUID in a Quarter Wave Resonator
similarity 0.88Lafe Spietz et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0806.2853
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Low-Inductance Undulatory Galvanometer Microwave Amplifier
similarity 0.88D. Hover et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.5209
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive readout of a flux qubit at the single photon level
similarity 0.88J. E. Johnson et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1109.2858
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multi-Path Interferometric Josephson Directional Amplifier for Qubit Readout
similarity 0.88Baleegh Abdo et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.02521
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tracking Photon Jumps with Repeated Quantum Non-Demolition Parity Measurements
similarity 0.88L. Sun et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.2534
Source status unknown — claims are unverified