The magnetic penetration depth influenced by the proximity to the surface
Yu. S. Barash
arXiv:1401.1410 · DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/26/4/045702 · 2014-01-07 · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The effect of smooth inhomogeneities near a superconductor boundary on the magnetic penetration depth $λ$ is studied with emphasis on the proximity-induced spatial dependence of the Cooper pair amplitude. The influence of surface pair breaking or pair formation on $λ$ is described within the Ginzburg-Landau theory, with no model assumptions, for both strongly type-II and strongly type-I homogeneous superconductors. Generic values of $λ$, which can differ greatly from the London penetration depth, are identified and demonstrated to be induced by large-scale inhomogeneities, when superconductivity is strongly suppressed on the surface.
Similar papers
Surface supercurrent diode effect
similarity 0.90Noah F. Q. Yuan · 2023 · arXiv:2305.04219
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Nonlinear Meissner Effect in Unconventional Superconductors
similarity 0.89D. Xu et al. · 1995 · arXiv:cond-mat/9502110
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of Meissner effect in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.89Shiping Feng et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1008.1472
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Meissner response of superconductors with inhomogeneous penetration depths
similarity 0.89V. G. Kogan & J. R. Kirtley · 2011 · arXiv:1103.4553
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic Insights into London Penetration Depth: Application to CeCoIn
similarity 0.89Mehdi Biderang et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2310.00499
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Observation of non-exponential magnetic penetration profiles in the Meissner state - A manifestation of non-local effects in superconductors
similarity 0.89A. Suter et al. · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0504626
Source status unknown — claims are unverified