Comparison of two approaches for the treatment of Gutzwiller variational wave functions
J. Kaczmarczyk
arXiv:1401.6784 · DOI 10.1080/14786435.2014.965235 · 2014-01-27 · Philosophical Magazine
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
In this work we analyze the variational problem emerging from the Gutzwiller approach to strongly correlated systems. This problem comprises the two main steps: evaluation and minimization of the ground state energy $W$ for the postulated Gutzwiller Wave Function (GWF). We discuss the available methods for evaluating $W$, in particular the recently proposed diagrammatic expansion method. We compare the two existing approaches to minimize $W$: the standard approach based on the effective single-particle Hamiltonian (EH) and the so-called Statistically-consistent Gutzwiller Approximation (SGA). On the example of the superconducting phase analysis we show that these approaches lead to the same minimum as it should be. However, the calculations within the SGA method are easier to perform and the two approaches allow for a simple cross-check of the obtained results. Finally, we show two ways of solving the equations resulting from the variational procedure, as well as how to incorporate the condition for a fixed number of particles.
Similar papers
Correlation-driven multigap d-wave superconductivity in Anderson lattice model
similarity 0.91M. M. Wysokiński et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1510.00224
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
A brief perspective of high temperature superconductivity in the cuprates: Strong correlations combined with superexchange match experiment
similarity 0.89Józef Spałek · 2022 · arXiv:2211.01024
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic States and Superconductivity in Multi-layer High-Tc Cuprates
similarity 0.89Michiyasu Mori et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110050
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping dependence of spin excitations in the stripe phase of high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.89G. Seibold & J. Lorenzana · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0509175
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in the doped bilayer Hubbard model
similarity 0.88Nicola Lanata` et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.4820
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin canting as a result of the competition between stripes and spirals in cuprates
similarity 0.87G. Seibold et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1011.4447
Source status unknown — claims are unverified