Superconductivity from repulsion in LiFeAs: novel s-wave symmetry and potential time-reversal symmetry breaking
F. Ahn, I. Eremin, J. Knolle, V. B. Zabolotnyy, S. V. Borisenko, B. Büchner, A. V. Chubukov
arXiv:1402.2112 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.144513 · 2014-02-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the structure of the pairing interaction and superconducting gap in LiFeAs by decomposing the pairing interaction for various kz cuts into s- and d-wave components and by studying the leading superconducting instabilities. We use the ten orbital tight-binding model, derived from ab-initio LDA calculations with hopping parameters extracted from the fit to ARPES experiments. We find that the pairing interaction almost decouples between two subsets, one consists of the outer hole pocket and two electron pockets, which are quasi-2D and are made largely out of dxy orbital, and the other consists of the two inner hole pockets, which are quasi-3D and are made mostly out of dxz and dyz orbitals. Furthermore, the bare inter-pocket and intra-pocket interactions within each subset are nearly equal. In this situation, small changes in the intra-pocket and inter-pocket interactions due to renormalizations by high-energy fermions give rise to a variety of different gap structures. We find four different configurations of the s-wave gap immediately below Tc: the one in which superconducting gap changes sign between two inner hole pockets and between the outer hole pocket and two electron pockets, the one in which the gap changes sign between two electron pockets and three hole pockets, the one in which the gap on the outer hole pocket differs in sign from the gaps on the other four pockets, and the one in which the gaps on two inner hole pockets have one sign, and the gaps on the outer hole pockets and on electron pockets have different sign. Different s-wave gap configurations emerge depending on whether the renormalized interactions increase attraction within each subset or increase the coupling between particular components of the two subsets. We argue that the state with opposite sign of the gaps on the two inner hole pockets has the best overlap with ARPES data.
Similar papers
Superconductivity from repulsion in LiFeAs: Novel s-wave symmetry and potential time-reversal symmetry breaking
similarity 0.93F. Ahn et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Anisotropic s-Wave Superconducting Gaps of LiFeAs Iron-Pnictide Superconductor
similarity 0.90K. Umezawa et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1111.3496
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting state in Fe-based materials and spin-fluctuation theory of pairing
similarity 0.90M. M. Korshunov · 2015 · arXiv:1510.08279
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
SR study of time-reversal symmetry constraints and bulk superfluid response in LiFeAs
similarity 0.89Rustem Khasanov et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2604.14376
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Correlation-enhanced odd-parity inter-orbital singlet pairing in the iron-pnictide superconductor LiFeAs
similarity 0.89R. Nourafkan et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1508.01789
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermion dynamical symmetry and strongly-correlated electrons: a comprehensive model of high-temperature superconductivity
similarity 0.89Mike Guidry et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2003.07994
Source status unknown — claims are unverified