← Back to search

Electronic Nematicity Revealed by Torque Magnetometry in Iron Arsenide EuFe$_2$(As$_{1-x}$P$_x$)$_2$

Xiaofeng Xu, W. H. Jiao, N. Zhou, Y. K. Li, B. Chen, C. Cao, Jianhui Dai, A. F. Bangura, Guanghan Cao

arXiv:1402.4124 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.104517 · 2014-02-17 · Physical Review B

T1theoretical9 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Electronic nematics, an electron orientational order which breaks the underlying rotational symmetry, have been observed in iron pnictide superconductors several years after their discovery. However, the universality of the doping dependence of this phase and its relation to other symmetry-breaking orders (such as superconductivity) in distinct families of iron pnictides, remain outstanding questions. Here we use torque magnetometry as a probe to study the rotational symmetry breaking in EuFe$_2$(As$_{1-x}$P$_x$)$_2$ without introducing external pressure. The nematic phase is found to proliferate well above the structural transition and to persist into the superconducting regime at optimal doping, after which it becomes absent or very weak, in sharp contrast to the behaviour observed in BaFe$_2$(As$_{1-x}$P$_x$)$_2$. These measurements suggest a putative quantum nematic transition near optimal doping under the superconducting dome.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
EuFe2(As1-xPx)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

30Pressure not reportedunknown
EuFe2(As1-xPx)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

21Pressure not reportedunknown
EuFe2(As1-xPx)2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

29Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers