Sudden reversal in the pressure dependence of Tc in the iron-based superconductor CsFe2As2: A possible link between inelastic scattering and pairing symmetry
F. F. Tafti, J. P. Clancy, M. Lapointe-Major, C. Collignon, S. Faucher, J. Sears, A. Juneau-Fecteau, N. Doiron-Leyraud, A. F. Wang, X. G. Luo, X. H. Chen, S. Desgreniers, Young-June Kim, Louis Taillefer
arXiv:1403.0110 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.134502 · 2014-03-01 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report a sudden reversal in the pressure dependence of Tc in the iron-based superconductor CsFe2As2, similar to that discovered recently in KFe2As2 [Tafti et al., Nat. Phys. 9, 349 (2013)]. As in KFe2As2, we observe no change in the Hall coefficient at the zero temperature limit, again ruling out a Lifshitz transition across the critical pressure Pc. We interpret the Tc reversal in the two materials as a phase transition from one pairing state to another, tuned by pressure, and investigate what parameters control this transition. Comparing samples of different residual resistivity, we find that a 6-fold increase in impurity scattering does not shift Pc. From a study of X-ray diffraction on KFe2As2 under pressure, we report the pressure dependence of lattice constants and As-Fe-As bond angle. The pressure dependence of these lattice parameters suggests that Pc should be significantly higher in CsFe2As2 than in KFe2As2, but we find on the contrary that Pc is lower in CsFe2As2. Resistivity measurements under pressure reveal a change of regime across Pc, suggesting a possible link between inelastic scattering and pairing symmetry.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CsFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 1.4 GPa | zero_resistance |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.8 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| KFe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | 1.75 GPa | unknown |
| Ba0.6K0.4Fe2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Sudden reversal in the pressure dependence of Tc in the iron-based superconductor CsFe2As2: A possible link between inelastic scattering and pairing symmetry
similarity 0.91F. F. Tafti et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Universal V-shaped temperature-pressure phase diagram in the iron-based superconductors KFe2As2, RbFe2As2, and CsFe2As2
similarity 0.90F. F. Tafti et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.6196
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structural, electronic, and dynamical properties of the tetragonal and collapsed tetragonal phases of KFeAs
similarity 0.89Andrzej Ptok et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1903.07953
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The Puzzle of High Temperature Superconductivity in Layered Iron Pnictides and Chalcogenides
similarity 0.89David C. Johnston · 2010 · arXiv:1005.4392
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Similarities between structural distortions under pressure and chemical doping in superconducting BaFe2As2
similarity 0.89Simon A. J. Kimber et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0912.2376
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pressure and chemical substitution effects in the local atomic structure of BaFe2As2
similarity 0.89E. Granado et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1102.0357
Source status unknown — claims are unverified