Imaging superconducting vortex core and lattice with the scanning tunneling microscope
H. Suderow, I. Guillamon, J. G. Rodrigo, S. Vieira
arXiv:1403.5514 · DOI 10.1088/0953-2048/27/6/063001 · 2014-03-21 · Superconductor Science and Technology
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The observation of vortices in superconductors was a major breakthrough in developing the conceptual background for superconducting applications. Each vortex carries a flux quantum, and the magnetic field radially decreases from the center. Techniques used to make magnetic field maps, such as magnetic decoration, give vortex lattice images in a variety of systems. However, strong type II superconductors allow penetration of the magnetic field over large distances, of order of the magnetic penetration depth λ. Superconductivity survives up to magnetic fields where, for imaging purposes, there is nearly no magnetic contrast. Static and dynamic properties of vortices are largely unknown at such high magnetic fields. Reciprocal space studies using neutron scattering give insight into the collective behavior. But the microscopic details of vortex arrangements and their motion remain difficult to obtain. Direct real space visualization can be made using scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy (STM/S). Instead of using magnetic contrast, the electronic density of states describes spatial variations of the quasiparticle and pair wavefunction properties. These are of order of the superconducting coherence length ξ, which is much smaller than λ. In principle, individual vortices can be imaged using STM up to the upper critical field where vortex cores, of size ξ, overlap. In this review, we describe recent advances in vortex imaging made with scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy. We introduce the technique and discuss vortex images which reveal the influence of the Fermi surface distribution of the superconducting gap on the internal structure of vortices, the collective behavior of the lattice in different materials and conditions, and the observation of vortex lattice melting.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NbS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5.7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| NbSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.1 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YNi2B2C Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | — |
Similar papers
Pairing insights in iron-based superconductors from scanning tunneling microscopy
similarity 0.91Can-Li Song & Jennifer E. Hoffman · 2012 · arXiv:1212.5164
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning tunneling spectroscopy with superconducting tips of Al
similarity 0.91I. Guillamon et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0709.4629
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent on a vortex core in 2H-NbSe: current driven scanning tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.90A. Maldonado et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1309.0952
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Field dependence of the vortex core size probed by STM
similarity 0.90A. Fente et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.00302
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Imaging ac losses in superconducting films via scanning Hall probe microscopy
similarity 0.90Rafael B. Dinner et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611706
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiparticle spectra of Abrikosov vortices in a uniform supercurrent flow
similarity 0.89C. Berthod · 2013 · arXiv:1309.3763
Source status unknown — claims are unverified