← Back to search

Direct spectroscopic evidence for phase competition between the pseudogap and superconductivity in Bi$_{2}$Sr$_{2}$CaCu$_{2}$O$_{8+δ}$

Makoto Hashimoto, Elizabeth A. Nowadnick, Rui-Hua. He, Inna M. Vishik, Brian Moritz, Yu He, Kiyohisa Tanaka, Robert G. Moore, Donghui Lu, Yoshiyuki Yoshida, Motoyuki Ishikado, Takao Sasagawa, Kazuhiro Fujita, Shigeyuki Ishida, Shinichi Uchida, Hiroshi Eisaki, Zahid Hussain, Thomas P. Devereaux, Zhi-Xun Shen

arXiv:1405.5199 · DOI 10.1038/nmat4116 · 2014-05-20 · Nature materials

T1experimental92 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In the high-temperature ($T_{c}$) cuprate superconductors, increasing evidence suggests that the pseudogap, existing below the pseudogap temperature $T$*, has a distinct broken electronic symmetry from that of superconductivity. Particularly, recent scattering experiments on the underdoped cuprates have suggested that a charge ordering competes with superconductivity. However, no direct link of this physics and the important low-energy excitations has been identified. Here we report an antagonistic singularity at $T_{c}$ in the spectral weight of Bi$_{2}$Sr$_{2}$CaCu$_{2}$O$_{8+δ}$ as a compelling evidence for phase competition, which persists up to a high hole concentration $p$ ~ 0.22. Comparison with a theoretical calculation confirms that the singularity is a signature of competition between the order parameters for the pseudogap and superconductivity. The observation of the spectroscopic singularity at finite temperatures over a wide doping range provides new insights into the nature of the competitive interplay between the two intertwined phases and the complex phase diagram near the pseudogap critical point.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers