Phase Separation, Competition, and Volume Fraction Control in NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$As
Long Ma, J. Dai, P. S. Wang, X. R. Lu, Yu Song, Chenglin Zhang, G. T. Tan, Pengcheng Dai, D. Hu, S. L. Li, B. Normand, Weiqiang Yu
arXiv:1406.2412 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.144502 · 2014-06-10 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report a detailed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study by combined $^{23}$Na and $^{75}$As measurements over a broad range of doping to map the phase diagram of NaFe$_{1-x}$Co$_x$As. In the underdoped regime ($x \le$ 0.017), we find a magnetic phase with robust antiferromagnetic (AFM) order, which we denote the {\it s}-AFM phase, cohabiting with a phase of weak and possibly proximity-induced AFM order ({\it w}-AFM) whose volume fraction $V \simeq 8$\% is approximately constant. Near optimal doping, at $x = 0.0175$, we observe a phase separation between static antiferromagnetism related to the {\it s}-AFM phase and a paramagnetic (PM) phase related to {\it w}-AFM. The volume fraction of AFM phase increases upon cooling, but both the N{é}el temperature and the volume fraction can be suppressed systematically by applying a $c$-axis magnetic field. On cooling below $T_c$, superconductivity occupies the PM region and its volume fraction grows at the expense of the AFM phase, demonstrating a phase separation of the two types of order based on volume exclusion. At higher dopings, static antiferromagnetism and even critical AFM fluctuations are completely suppressed by superconductivity. Thus the phase diagram we establish contains two distinct types of phase separation and reflects a strong competition between AFM and superconducting phases both in real space and in momentum space. We suggest that both this strict mutual exclusion and the robustness of superconductivity against magnetism are consequences of the extreme two-dimensionality of NaFeAs.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| NaFe1-xCoxAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Simultaneous Vanishing of the Nematic Electronic State and the Structural Orthorhombicity in NaFeCoAs Single Crystals
similarity 0.90Qiang Deng et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1411.0955
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Structural, Magnetic, and Superconducting Properties of Ba1-xNaxFe2As2
similarity 0.89Sevda Avci et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1309.7887
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron doping evolution of the magnetic excitations in NaFeCoAs
similarity 0.89Scott V. Carr et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1605.02695
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping induced magnetic clusters and Co spin state transition in Na_xCoO_2 with 0.78<x<.97
similarity 0.89C. Bernhard et al. · 2007 · arXiv:cond-mat/0701033
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting the phase diagram of LaFeCoAsO on single crystals by thermodynamic methods
similarity 0.89Francesco Scaravaggi et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.05760
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.89Pengcheng Dai · 2015 · arXiv:1503.02340
Source status unknown — claims are unverified