Comparative study of the Meissner and skin effects in superconductors
Jacob Szeftel, Nicolas Sandeau, Antoine Khater
arXiv:1407.1231 · 2014-07-04
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The Meissner effect is studied by using an approach based on Newton and Maxwell's equations. The objective is to assess the relevance of London's equation and shed light on the connection between the Meissner and skin effects. The properties of a superconducting cylinder, cooled in a magnetic field, are accounted for within the same framework. The radial Hall effect is predicted. The energy, associated with the Meissner effect, is calculated and compared with the binding energy of the superconducting phase with respect to the normal one.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 1.19 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
The Physical Origins of the Meissner Effect and London Penetration Depth
similarity 0.91X. Q. Huang · 2010 · arXiv:1008.4418
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel Sample Stages for Detecting Magnetic Feedback Due to Superconducting Transition Based on the Mirror Image Method
similarity 0.90Ziyan Li & Mengbo Guo · 2022 · arXiv:2206.05686
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Study of the skin effect in superconducting materials
similarity 0.90Szeftel, Jacob et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1610.09501
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Topological defects and other properties of multicomponent superconductors
similarity 0.89Julien Garaud · 2022 · arXiv:2203.12194
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Paramagnetic instability at normal-metal - superconductor interfaces
similarity 0.89A. L. Fauchere et al. · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9901112
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
On the physical significance of London's equation
similarity 0.89Jacob Szeftel et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1507.03330
Source status unknown — claims are unverified