Temporary cooling of quasiparticles and delay in voltage response of superconducting bridges after abrupt switching on the supercritical current
D. Yu. Vodolazov, F. M. Peeters
arXiv:1407.3287 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.094504 · 2014-07-11
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We revisit the problem of the dynamic response of a superconducting bridge after abruptly switching on the supercritical current $I>I_c$. In contrast to previous theoretical works we take into account spatial gradients and use both the local temperature approach and the kinetic equation for the distribution function of quasiparticles. In both models the finite delay time $t_d$ in the voltage response is connected with temporary cooling of quasiparticles due to the suppression of the superconducitng order parameter by current. We find that $t_d$ has different values and different temperature dependencies in the considered models. In turns out that the presence of even small inhomogeneities in the bridge or of bulk leads/contacts at the ends of the {\it homogenous} bridge favors a local suppression of the superconducting order parameter $|Δ|$ during the dynamic response. It results in a decrease of the delay time, in comparison with the spatially uniform model, due to the diffusion of nonequilibrium quasiparticles from the region with locally suppressed $|Δ|$. In case the current distribution is spatially nonuniform across the bridge the delay time is mainly connected with the time needed for the nucleation of the first vortex at the position where the current density is maximal (at $I\sim I_c$ and for not very wide films). We also find that a short alternating current pulse (sinusoid like) with zero time-average may result in a nonzero time-averaged voltage response where its sign depends on the phase of the ac current.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Temporary cooling of quasiparticles and delay in voltage response of superconducting bridges after abruptly switching on the supercritical current
similarity 0.94D. Yu. Vodolazov & F. M. Peeters
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electron cooling in diffusive normal metal - superconductor tunnel junctions with a spin-valve ferromagnetic interlayer
similarity 0.89A. Ozaeta et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1203.6735
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Heating of quasiparticles driven by oscillations of the order parameter in short superconducting microbridges
similarity 0.88D. Y. Vodolazov & F. M. Peeters · 2011 · arXiv:1105.5489
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Suppression and enhancement of the critical current in multiterminal S/N/S mesoscopic structures
similarity 0.87R. Seviour & A. F. Volkov · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0002210
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in a diffusive ferromagnet with spin-active interfaces
similarity 0.87Audrey Cottet & Wolfgang Belzig · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0505403
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Minimal timing jitter in superconducting nanowire single photon detectors
similarity 0.87D. Yu. Vodolazov · 2018 · arXiv:1807.07709
Source status unknown — claims are unverified