Two-gap superconductivity in heavily n-doped graphene: ab initio Migdal-Eliashberg theory
E. R. Margine, Feliciano Giustino
arXiv:1407.7005 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.014518 · 2014-07-25 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Graphene is the only member of the carbon family from zero- to three-dimensional materials for which superconductivity has not been observed yet. At this time, it is not clear whether the quest for superconducting graphene is hindered by technical challenges, or else by the fluctuation of the order parameter in two dimensions. In this area, ab initio calculations are useful to guide experimental efforts by narrowing down the search space. In this spirit, we investigate from first principles the possibility of inducing superconductivity in doped graphene using the fully anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory powered by Wannier-Fourier interpolation. To address a best-case scenario, we consider both electron and hole doping at high carrier densities, so as to align the Fermi level to a van Hove singularity. In these conditions, we find superconducting gaps of $s$-wave symmetry, with a slight anisotropy induced by the trigonal warping, and, in the case of $n$-doped graphene, an unexpected two-gap structure reminiscent of MgB$_2$. Our Migdal-Eliashberg calculations suggest that the observation of superconductivity at low temperature should be possible for $n$-doped graphene at carrier densities exceeding $10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaC6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| Cs3C60 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 38 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Two-gap superconductivity in heavily n-doped graphene: Ab initio Migdal-Eliashberg theory
similarity 0.91E. R. Margine & Feliciano Giustino
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductor discovery in the emerging paradigm of Materials Informatics
similarity 0.90Huan Tran et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2510.25971
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of electron-phonon coupling strength on signatures of even and odd-frequency superconductivity
similarity 0.90Alex Aperis et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1912.02016
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd momentum pairing and superconductivity in vertical graphene heterostructures
similarity 0.90Francisco Guinea & Bruno Uchoa · 2012 · arXiv:1207.7318
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional superconducting states of interlayer pairing in bilayer and trilayer graphene
similarity 0.90Mir Vahid Hosseini & Malek Zareyan · 2012 · arXiv:1210.1587
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical prediction of structural stability and superconductivity in T-hexagonal molybdenum dihydrides Monolayer
similarity 0.89Jakkapat Seeyangnok & Udomsilp Pinsook · 2026 · arXiv:2607.13297
Source status unknown — claims are unverified