← Back to search

The electronic structure of CeNiGe3 and YNiGe3 superconductors by ab initio calculations

M. J. Winiarski, M. Samsel-Czekała

arXiv:1407.8435 · DOI 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.10.027 · 2014-07-31 · Solid State Communications

T1theoretical6 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Band structures of pressure-induced CeNiGe3 and exotic BCS-like YNiGe3 superconductors have been calculated employing the full-potential local-orbital code. Both the local density approximation (LDA) and LDA+U treatment of the exchange-correlation energy were used. The investigations were focused on differences between electronic properties of both compounds. Our results indicate that the Ce-based system exhibits higher density of states at the Fermi level, dominated by the Ce 4f states, in contrast to its non f-electron counterpart. The Fermi surface (FS) of each compound originates from three bands and consists of both holelike and electronlike sheets. The specific FS nesting properties of only CeNiGe3 enable an occurrence of spin fluctuations of a helicoidal antiferromagnetic character that may lead to unconventional pairing mechanism in this superconductor. In turn, the topology of the FS in YNiGe3 reveals a possibility of multi-band superconductivity, which can explain the observed anomalous jump at Tc in its specific heat.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CeNiGe3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.48Pressure not reportedunknown
YNiGe3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.46Pressure not reportedunknown
La3Ni4Ge4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.7Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers