Orbital occupancy and charge doping in iron-based superconductors
Claudia Cantoni, Jonathan E. Mitchell, Andrew F. May, Michael A. McGuire, Juan-Carlos Idrobo, Tom Berlijn, Elbio Dagotto, Matthew F. Chisholm, Wu Zhou, Stephen J. Pennycook, Athena S. Sefat, Brian C. Sales
arXiv:1410.0971 · 2014-10-03
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Iron-based superconductors (FBS) comprise several families of compounds having the same atomic building blocks for superconductivity, but large discrepancies among their physical properties. A longstanding goal in the field has been to decipher the key underlying factors controlling TC and the various doping mechanisms. In FBS materials this is complicated immensely by the different crystal and magnetic structures exhibited by the different families. In this paper, using aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) coupled with electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), we observe a universal behavior in the hole concentration and magnetic moment across different families. All the parent materials have the same total number of electrons in the Fe 3d bands; however, the local Fe magnetic moment varies due to different orbital occupancy. Although the common understanding has been that both long-range and local magnetic moments decrease with doping, we find that, near the onset of superconductivity, the local magnetic moment increases and shows a dome-like maximum near optimal doping, where no ordered magnetic moment is present. In addition, we address a longstanding debate concerning how Co substitutions induces superconductivity in the 122 arsenide family, showing that the 3d band filling increases a function of doping. These new microscopic insights into the properties of FBS demonstrate the importance of spin fluctuations for the superconducting state, reveal changes in orbital occupancy among different families of FBS, and confirm charge doping as one of the mechanisms responsible for superconductivity in 122 arsenides.
Similar papers
Localization and Orbital Selectivity in Iron-Based Superconductors with Cu Substitution
similarity 0.89Yang Liu et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1506.00767
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electronic origin of structural transition in 122 Fe based superconductors
similarity 0.88Haranath Ghosh et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1611.08295
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic interactions in iron superconductors studied with a five-orbital model within the Hartree-Fock and Heisenberg approximations
similarity 0.87M. J. Calderón et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hole and Electron Contributions to the Transport Properties of Ba(Fe_(1-x)Ru_x)_2As_2 Single Crystals
similarity 0.87F. Rullier-Albenque et al. · 2010 · arXiv:1003.5376
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-Orbit Coupling and Magnetic Anisotropy in Iron-Based Superconductors
similarity 0.87Daniel D. Scherer & Brian M. Andersen · 2017 · arXiv:1711.02460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Role of magnetism in superconductivity of BaFe2As2: Study of 5d Au-doped crystals
similarity 0.87Li Li et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified