State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit
J. Kelly, R. Barends, A. G. Fowler, A. Megrant, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, D. Sank, J. Y. Mutus, B. Campbell, Yu Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, I. -C. Hoi, C. Neill, P. J. J. O'Malley, C. Quintana, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. N. Cleland, John M. Martinis
arXiv:1411.7403 · DOI 10.1038/nature14270 · 2014-11-26
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum computing becomes viable when a quantum state can be preserved from environmentally-induced error. If quantum bits (qubits) are sufficiently reliable, errors are sparse and quantum error correction (QEC) is capable of identifying and correcting them. Adding more qubits improves the preservation by guaranteeing increasingly larger clusters of errors will not cause logical failure - a key requirement for large-scale systems. Using QEC to extend the qubit lifetime remains one of the outstanding experimental challenges in quantum computing. Here, we report the protection of classical states from environmental bit-flip errors and demonstrate the suppression of these errors with increasing system size. We use a linear array of nine qubits, which is a natural precursor of the two-dimensional surface code QEC scheme, and track errors as they occur by repeatedly performing projective quantum non-demolition (QND) parity measurements. Relative to a single physical qubit, we reduce the failure rate in retrieving an input state by a factor of 2.7 for five qubits and a factor of 8.5 for nine qubits after eight cycles. Additionally, we tomographically verify preservation of the non-classical Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state. The successful suppression of environmentally-induced errors strongly motivates further research into the many exciting challenges associated with building a large-scale superconducting quantum computer.
Similar papers
Logic gates at the surface code threshold: Superconducting qubits poised for fault-tolerant quantum computing
similarity 0.91R. Barends et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1402.4848
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Erasure Detection of a Dual-Rail Qubit Encoded in a Double-Post Superconducting Cavity
similarity 0.89Akshay Koottandavida et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Hardware-Efficient Leakage-Reduction Scheme for Quantum Error Correction with Superconducting Transmon Qubits
similarity 0.89F. Battistel et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Implementation of the three-qubit phase-flip error correction code with superconducting qubits
similarity 0.88L. Tornberg et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0803.1747
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dissipation-induced continuous quantum error correction for superconducting circuits
similarity 0.88Joachim Cohen & Mazyar Mirrahimi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Measuring and Suppressing Quantum State Leakage in a Superconducting Qubit
similarity 0.88Zijun Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified