Electronic structure of ruthenium-doped iron chalcogenides
M. J. Winiarski, M. Samsel-Czekała, A. Ciechan
arXiv:1412.3961 · DOI 10.1063/1.4903957 · 2014-12-12
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The structural and electronic properties of hypothetical Ru$_x$Fe$_{1-x}$Se and Ru$_x$Fe$_{1-x}$Te systems have been investigated from first principles within the density functional theory (DFT). Reasonable values of lattice parameters and chalcogen atomic positions in the tetragonal unit cell of iron chalcogenides have been obtained with the use of norm-conserving pseudopotentials. The well known discrepancies between experimental data and DFT-calculated results for structural parameters of iron chalcogenides are related to the semicore atomic states which were frozen in the used here approach. Such an approach yields valid results of the electronic structures of the investigated compounds. The Ru-based chalcogenides exhibit the same topology of the Fermi surface (FS) as that of FeSe, differing only in subtle FS nesting features. Our calculations predict that the ground states of RuSe and RuTe are nonmagnetic, whereas those of the solid solutions Ru$_x$Fe$_{1-x}$Se and Ru$_x$Fe$_{1-x}$Te become the single- and double-stripe antiferromagnetic, respectively. However, the calculated stabilization energy values are comparable for each system. The phase transitions between these magnetic arrangements may be induced by slight changes of the chalcogen atom positions and the lattice parameters $a$ in the unit cell of iron selenides and tellurides. Since the superconductivity in iron chalcogenides is believed to be mediated by the spin fluctuations in single-stripe magnetic phase, the Ru$_x$Fe$_{1-x}$Se and Ru$_x$Fe$_{1-x}$Te systems are good candidates for new superconducting iron-based materials.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure unresolved | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 37 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe0.5Te0.5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeTe0.8S0.2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Strain effects on electronic structure of the iron selenide superconductor
similarity 0.92M. J. Winiarski et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1308.2933
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synergy and competition between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in FeSe under pressure
similarity 0.90Guan-Yu Chen et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1811.11599
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum criticality in quasi-binary compounds of iron-based superconductors
similarity 0.90Ovchenkov Y. A. et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2312.10901
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting materials classes: introduction and overview
similarity 0.89J. E. Hirsch et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1504.03318
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe
similarity 0.89Amalia I. Coldea & Matthew D. Watson · 2017 · arXiv:1706.00338
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-Based Superconductors: A Decade of Materials, Magnetism, and Mechanisms
similarity 0.89Xingye Lu et al. · 2026 · arXiv:2607.11355
Source status unknown — claims are unverified