What superconducts in sulfur hydrides under pressure, and why
N. Bernstein, C. S. Hellberg, M. D. Johannes, I. I. Mazin, M. J. Mehl
arXiv:1501.00196 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.060511 · 2014-12-31
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The recent discovery of superconductivity at 190~K in highly compressed H$_{2}$S is spectacular not only because it sets a record high critical temperature, but because it does so in a material that appears to be, and we argue here that it is, a conventional strong-coupling BCS superconductor. Intriguingly, superconductivity in the observed pressure and temperature range was predicted theoretically in a similar compound H$_{3}$S. Several important questions about this remarkable result, however, are left unanswered: (1) Does the stoichiometry of the superconducting compound differ from the nominal composition, and could it be the predicted H$_{3}$S compound? (2) Is the physical origin of the anomalously high critical temperature related only to the high H phonon frequencies, or does strong electron-ion coupling play a role? We show that at experimentally relevant pressures H$_2$S is unstable, decomposing into H$_3$S and S, and that H$_3$S has a record high $T_c$ due to its covalent bonds driven metallic. The main reason for this extraordinarily high $T_c$ in H$_3$S as compared with MgB$_2$, another compound with a similar superconductivity mechanism, is the high vibrational frequency of the much lighter H atoms.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| H2S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 190 | 200 GPa | unknown |
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 197.5 | 200 GPa | unknown |
| MgB2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 39 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| H3S Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 190 | 200 GPa | unknown |
Similar papers
Conventional superconductivity at 190 K at high pressures
similarity 0.92A. P. Drozdov et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1412.0460
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The quantum nature of the superconducting hydrogen sulfide at finite temperatures
similarity 0.91Ying Yuan et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1607.02348
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cubic H3S around 200 GPa: An atomic hydrogen superconductor stabilized by sulfur
similarity 0.91D. A. Papaconstantopoulos et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of van Hove singularities on high-Tc superconductivity in H3S
similarity 0.91Wataru Sano et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1512.07365
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Direct Meissner Effect Observation of Superconductivity in Compressed H2S
similarity 0.91Xiaoli Huang et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1610.02630
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting hydrides under pressure
similarity 0.90Chris J. Pickard et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1910.00385
Source status unknown — claims are unverified