Two-photon lasing by a superconducting qubit
P. Neilinger, M. Rehák, M. Grajcar, G. Oelsner, U. Hübner, E. Il'ichev
arXiv:1501.01543 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104516 · 2015-01-07 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the response of a magnetic-field-driven superconducting qubit strongly coupled to a superconducting coplanar waveguide resonator. We observed a strong amplification/damping of a probing signal at different resonance points corresponding to a one and two-photon emission/absorption. The sign of the detuning between the qubit frequency and the probe determines whether amplification or damping is observed. The larger blue detuned driving leads to two-photon lasing while the larger red detuning cools the resonator. Our experimental results are in good agreement with the theoretical model of qubit lasing and cooling at the Rabi frequency.
Similar papers
Two-photon lasing by a superconducting qubit
similarity 0.92P. Neilinger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single atom laser in normal-superconductor quantum dots
similarity 0.90Gianluca Rastelli & Michele Governale
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-photon-driven high-order sideband transitions in an ultrastrongly coupled circuit quantum electrodynamics system
similarity 0.90Zhen Chen et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1602.01584
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak continuous monitoring of a flux qubit using coplanar waveguide resonator
similarity 0.89G. Oelsner et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0910.4739
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Long-range and selective coupler for superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.89H. Nakano et al. · 2007 · arXiv:0705.1405
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resonant and off-resonant microwave signal manipulation in coupled superconducting resonators
similarity 0.88Mathieu Pierre et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1802.09034
Source status unknown — claims are unverified