Flux-vector model of spin noise in superconducting circuits: Electron versus nuclear spins and role of phase transition
S. LaForest, Rogerio de Sousa
arXiv:1501.03776 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.054502 · 2015-01-15 · arXiv: Superconductivity
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs) and other superconducting circuits are limited by intrinsic flux noise with spectral density $1/f^α$ with $α<1$ whose origin is believed to be due to spin impurities. Here we present a theory of flux noise that takes into account the vectorial nature of the coupling of spins to superconducting wires. We present explicit numerical calculations of the flux noise power (spectral density integrated over all frequencies) for electron impurities and lattice nuclear spins under several different assumptions. The noise power is shown to be dominated by surface electron spins near the wire edges, with bulk lattice nuclear spins contributing $\sim 5$% of the noise power in aluminum and niobium wires. We consider the role of electron spin phase transitions, showing that the spin-spin correlation length (describing e.g. the average size of ferromagnetic spin clusters) greatly impacts the scaling of flux noise with wire geometry. Remarkably, flux noise power is exactly equal to zero when the spins are polarized along the flux vector direction, forming what we call a poloidal state. Flux noise is non-zero for other spin textures, but gets reduced in the presence of correlated ferromagnetic fluctuations between the top and bottom wire surfaces, where the flux vectors are antiparallel. This demonstrates that engineering spin textures and/or inter-surface correlation provides a method to reduce flux noise in superconducting devices.
Similar papers
Flux-vector model of spin noise in superconducting circuits: Electron versus nuclear spins and role of phase transition
similarity 0.91S. LaForest & Rogério de Sousa
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity-enhanced magnetic field noise
similarity 0.88Shane P. Kelly & Yaroslav Tserkovnyak · 2024 · arXiv:2412.05465
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of Gaussian superconducting fluctuations in nonlocal noise magnetometry
similarity 0.88Dror Orgad · 2026 · arXiv:2605.18970
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterizing two-dimensional superconductivity via nanoscale noise magnetometry with single-spin qubits
similarity 0.87Pavel E. Dolgirev et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2106.05283
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fluctuations of the Josephson current and electron-electron interactions in superconducting weak links
similarity 0.87A. V. Galaktionov & A. D. Zaikin · 2010 · arXiv:1004.2990
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Stability of Disordered Topological Superconducting Phases in Magnet--Superconductor Hybrid Systems
similarity 0.87Eric Mascot et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1905.05923
Source status unknown — claims are unverified