Justification of the canonical quantization of the Josephson effect
Krzysztof Pomorski, Adam Bednorz
arXiv:1502.00511 · 2015-02-02
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum devices based on Josephson effect in superconductors are usually described by a Hamiltonian obtained by commonly used canonical quantization. However, this recipe has not been yet rigorously justified. We show that this approach is indeed correct in certain range of parameters. We find the condition of the validity of such quantization and the lowest corrections to the Josephson energy.
Similar papers
A microscopic model for the intrinsic Josephson tunneling in high-T_C superconductors
similarity 0.89O. Schmitt et al. · 1997 · arXiv:cond-mat/9707303
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
DC Josephson Effect in SNS Junctions of Anisotropic Superconductors
similarity 0.89Yasuhiro Asano · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0110085
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak ergodicity breaking in Josephson-junction arrays
similarity 0.89Angelo Russomanno et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2204.08047
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Revisiting Andreev processes in superconductor-graphene-superconductor (SGS) Josephson junctions: Comparison with experimental results
similarity 0.89Shahrukh Salim et al. · 2023 · arXiv:2304.10741
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson effect in graphene SBS junctions
similarity 0.89Moitri Maiti & K. Sengupta · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0611614
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantized Josephson phase battery
similarity 0.89Subhajit Pal & Colin Benjamin · 2018 · arXiv:1811.02484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified