← Back to search

Thermodynamics of the hydrogen dominant potassium hydride superconductor at high pressure

D. Szczȩśniak, R. Szczȩśniak

arXiv:1502.03017 · 2015-02-10

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

In the present paper we report comprehensive analysis of the thermodynamic properties of novel hydrogen dominant potassium hydride superconductor (KH$_{6}$). Our computations are conducted within the Eliashberg theory which yields quantitative estimations of the most important thermodynamic properties of superconducting phase. In particular, we observe, that together with the increasing pressure all the thermodynamic properties decrease, e.g. $T_{C} \in \left< 72.91 , 55.50 \right>$ K for $p \in \left< 166 , 300 \right>$ GPa. It is predicted that such decreasing behavior corresponds to the decreasing hydrogen lattice molecularization with increasing pressure value. Futhermore, by calculating the dimensionless thermodynamic ratios, familiar in the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory (BCS), it is proved that KH$_{6}$ material is a strong-coupling superconductor and cannot be quantitatively described within the BCS theory.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
KH6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

72.91166 GPaunknown
KH6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

70.73230 GPaunknown
KH6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

55.5300 GPaunknown
H2S

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

190Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers