Comment on "Interface tension of Bose-Einstein condensates" by Bert Van Schaeybroeck, Phys. Rev. A 78, 023624-9 (2008)
Todor M. Mishonov
arXiv:1502.07171 · 2015-02-25 · arXiv: Quantum Gases
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The purpose of the comment is to point out that the leading term of the Ginzburg-Landau nonanalytical correction to the interface tension of Bose-Einstein condensates with strong segregation and the surface tension of extreme type-I superconductors are described by a common coefficient derived from the universal equation for the phase boundary. The agreement between the numerical value of the coefficients gives a hint that this can be an exact result which deserves to be checked. The outcome will be of interest for physicists working in both fields.
Similar papers
Nonequilibrium mesoscopic superconductors in a fluctuational regime
similarity 0.85N. Chtchelkatchev & V. Vinokur · 2008 · arXiv:0812.2372
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate in the vicinity of a superconductor
similarity 0.84Igor Sapina & Thomas Dahm · 2014 · arXiv:1410.7153
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
New mechanism and exact theory of superconductivity from strong repulsive interaction
similarity 0.84Valentin Crépel & Liang Fu · 2020 · arXiv:2012.08528
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface Melting of the Vortex Lattice in Layered Superconductors: Density Functional Theory
similarity 0.84A. De Col et al. · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0610365
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Condensation energy of superconducting BEC of non-interacting Cooper pairs in multilayers
similarity 0.84I. Chávez et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2503.00473
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ginzburg-Landau equation and vortex liquid phase of Fermi liquid superconductors
similarity 0.84Tai-Kai Ng & Wai-Tak Tse · 2006 · arXiv:cond-mat/0606479
Source status unknown — claims are unverified