Selection rules for Cooper pairing in two-dimensional interfaces and sheets
Mathias S. Scheurer, Daniel F. Agterberg, Jörg Schmalian
arXiv:1503.03646 · DOI 10.1038/s41535-016-0008-1 · 2015-03-12 · npj Quantum Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Thin sheets deposited on a substrate and interfaces of correlated materials offer a plethora of routes towards the realization of exotic phases of matter. In these systems, inversion symmetry is broken which strongly affects the properties of possible instabilities -- in particular in the superconducting channel. By combining symmetry and energetic arguments, we derive general and experimentally accessible selection rules for Cooper instabilities in noncentrosymmetric systems which yield necessary and sufficient conditions for spontaneous time-reversal-symmetry breaking at the superconducting transition and constrain the orientation of the triplet vector. We discuss in detail the implications for various different materials. For instance, we conclude that the pairing state in thin layers of Sr$_2$RuO$_4$ must, as opposed to its bulk superconducting state, preserve time-reversal symmetry with its triplet vector being parallel to the plane of the system. All pairing states of this system allowed by the selection rules are predicted to display topological Majorana modes at dislocations or at the edge of the system. Applying our results to the LaAlO$_3$/SrTiO$_3$ heterostructures, we find that while the condensates of the (001) and (110) oriented interfaces must be time-reversal symmetric, spontaneous time-reversal-symmetry breaking can only occur for the less studied (111) interface. We also discuss the consequences for thin layers of URu$_2$Si$_2$ and UPt$_3$ as well as for single-layer FeSe. On a more general level, our considerations might serve as a design principle in the search for time-reversal-symmetry-breaking superconductivity in the absence of external magnetic fields.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| URu2Si2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| UPt3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Mixed-Parity Superconductivity in Sr2RuO4
similarity 0.90M. Eschrig et al. · 2001 · arXiv:cond-mat/0101208
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Surface State of Inter-orbital Pairing State in SrRuO Superconductor
similarity 0.90Satoshi Ando et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2210.02136
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Identifying possible pairing states in SrRuO by tunneling spectroscopy
similarity 0.90Shu-Ichiro Suzuki et al. · 2019 · arXiv:1911.09453
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The role of spin-orbit coupling for the superconducting state in Sr_2RuO_4
similarity 0.89Kwai-Kong Ng & Manfred Sigrist · 1999 · arXiv:cond-mat/9911325
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting subphase and substantial Knight shift in
similarity 0.89R. Gupta et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2007.03811
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting pairing in SrRuO from weak to intermediate coupling
similarity 0.89Li-Da Zhang et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.00010
Source status unknown — claims are unverified