← Back to search

Broken Time Reversal Symmetry in Superconducting Pr1-xCexPt4Ge12

Jian Zhang, D. E. MacLaughlin, A. D. Hillier, Z. F. Ding, K. Huang, M. B. Maple, Lei Shu

arXiv:1503.03967 · DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.024508 · 2015-03-13 · Physical Review B

T3theoretical13 citations

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

We report results of zero-field muon spin relaxation experiments on the filled-skutterudite superconductors~Pr$_{1-x}$Ce$_{x}$Pt$_4$Ge$_{12}$, $x = 0$, 0.07, 0.1, and 0.2, to investigate the effect of Ce doping on broken time-reversal symmetry (TRS) in the superconducting state. In these alloys broken TRS is signaled by the onset of a spontaneous static local magnetic field~$B_s$ below the superconducting transition temperature. We find that $B_s$ decreases linearly with $x$ and $\to 0$ at $x \approx 0.4$, close to the concentration above which superconductivity is no longer observed. The (Pr,Ce)Pt$_4$Ge$_{12}$ and isostructural (Pr,La)Os$_4$Sb$_{12}$ alloy series both exhibit superconductivity with broken TRS, and in both the decrease of $B_s$ is proportional to the decrease of Pr concentration. This suggests that Pr-Pr intersite interactions are responsible for the broken TRS\@. The two alloy series differ in that the La-doped alloys are superconducting for all La concentrations, suggesting that in (Pr,Ce)Pt$_4$Ge$_{12}$ pair-breaking by Ce doping suppresses superconductivity. For all $x$ the dynamic muon spin relaxation rate decreases somewhat in the superconducting state. This may be due to Korringa relaxation by conduction electrons, which is reduced by the opening of the superconducting energy gap.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
PrPt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.7Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr0.93Ce0.07Pt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.6Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr0.9Ce0.1Pt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.1Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr0.8Ce0.2Pt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2Pressure not reportedunknown
PrPt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.9Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr0.93Ce0.07Pt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

4.5Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr0.9Ce0.1Pt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.4Pressure not reportedunknown
Pr0.8Ce0.2Pt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2Pressure not reportedunknown
PrPt4Ge12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

7.9Pressure not reportedunknown
PrOs4Sb12

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.8Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers