Interplay between density and superconducting quantum critical fluctuations
S. Caprara, N. Bergeal, J. Lesueur, M. Grilli
arXiv:1503.05997 · 2015-03-20
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider the case of a density-driven metal-superconductor transition in the proximity of an electronic phase separation. In particular we investigate the interplay between superconducting fluctuations and density fluctuations, which become quantum critical when the electronic phase separation vanishes at zero temperature into a quantum critical point. In this situation the critical dynamical density fluctuations strongly affect the dynamics of the Cooper pair fluctuations, which acquire a more singular character with a z=3 dynamical critical index. This gives rise to a scenario that possibly rules the disappearance of superconductivity when the electron density is reduced by elecrostatic gating at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface.
Similar papers
Electrostatically tuned quantum superconductor-metal-insulator transition at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface
similarity 0.89T. Schneider et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0904.2488
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum magnetism and criticality
similarity 0.88Subir Sachdev · 2007 · arXiv:0711.3015
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Considerations on the Mechanisms and Transition Temperatures of Superconductors
similarity 0.88Varma, C. M. · 2010 · arXiv:1001.3618
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum critical point in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.88V. R. Shaginyan et al. · 2009 · arXiv:0902.2557
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elementary Excitations due to Orbital Degrees of Freedom in Iron Based Superconductors
similarity 0.88Wei-Cheng Lee et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1303.6295
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pairing at a single Van Hove point
similarity 0.88Risto Ojajärvi et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2408.05572
Source status unknown — claims are unverified